216 BOPINHO QUE POHA É ESSA NOTICIA DE QUE ESTAO CONSTRUINDO MIL REPLICAS DO PORTAL DO TEMPLO DE BAAL (O ISIS DESTRUIU TODO O TEMPLO MENOS O PORTAL NÃO É ESTRANHO?) NO MUNDO INTEIRO MEW, LEMBRA O LANCE DOS PORTAIS DO SPOILER QUE VOCE FEZ DO FILME "OS AGENTES DO DESTINO" (THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU) E ISSO TEM A VER COM A MORTE (SACRIFICIO) DO CANTOR PRINCE

O LANCE É O SEGUINTE AMIGOS.


VOCÊS LEMBRAM DO LANCE DOS PORTAIS MAÇONICOS QUE COMENTEI NO SPOILER DO FILME "OS AGENTES DO DESTINO" - THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU

LINK:

http://novaordemmundialsemcensura.blogspot.com.br/2015/01/107-filmespoiler-os-agentes-do-destino_23.html

POIS QUE O ISIS, QUE É CRIA DO TRIO USA-INGLATERRA-ISRAEL 

ESSE ISIS ANDOU EXPLODINDO UMA CIDADE SAGRADA NA SIRIA CHAMADA "PALMIRA", CERTO?



O ISIS ATE USOU PHOTOSHOP PARA "PROVAR" AO MUNDO QUE ELES ESTAO ARREBENTANDO TUDO.

OLHA QUE EXPLOSAO MAIS FAKE PHOTOSHOP TOTAL FOTO TODA BORRADA

VEJAM O ENTORNO DO COGUMELO ESTÁ TODA BORRADA NAO PRECISA SER GENIO NO PHOTOSHOP PARA PERCEBER QUE É FAKE TOTAL

DENTRE VÁRIOS TEMPLOS RELIGIOSOS HAVIA UM CHAMADO BAAL-SHAMIN

O TEMPLO DENTRO DELE ANTES DA CHEGADA DO ISIS ERA ASSIM:

AGORA DIZEM QUE O ISIS "DESTRUIU TUDO" E FICOU ASSIM:

SOBROU SÓ O PORTAL, VOCÊS ACREDITAM NISSO QUE ELES SÃO "BONZINHOS" E DEIXARAM SÓ O PORTAL MAÇONICO EM PÉ?????

VEJAM SÓ O TAL DO "ANTES E DEPOIS":

MAS QUE DESTRUIÇÃO CIRÚRGICA AMIGOS!!!!!

DESTRUIRAM TUDINHU, DEIXARAM SÓ O PORTALZINHU DE PÉ

JUSTO O PORTAL QUE "DISSERAM" QUE VAO CONSTRUIR 1000 RÉPLICAS DELE E ESPALHAR PELO MUNDO!!!!!

UM TAL DE Institute for Digital Archaeology PROMETE RECONSTRUIR PARTES DE OBRAS ARQUEOLÓGICAS DESTRUÍDAS PELO ISIS E DIVULGAR MUNDO AFORA.

OS LEITORES DO BLOG CONHECEM BAAL
 É UM DEUS CHIFRUDO AO QUAL CERTAS SEITAS OU SOCIEDADES SECRETAS FAZEM SACRIFICIOS ATÉ HOJE, OS JUDEUS MUDARAM O NOME DE BAAL PARA MOLOCH (POSTERIORMENTE REPRESENTADO PELA CORUJA DE BOHEMIAN GROOVE)

Ancient Jewish History:
The Cult of Moloch

Introduction

Evidence concerning Moloch worship in ancient Israel is found in the legal, as well as in the historical and prophetic literature of the Bible. In the Pentateuch, the laws of the Holiness Code speak about giving or passing children to Moloch (Lev. 18:21, 20:2–4) and the law in Deuteronomy speaks of "passing [one's] son or daughter through fire" (18:10). Although Moloch is not named in the Deuteronomy passage, it is likely that his cult was the object of the prohibition. 

The author of the Book of Kings speaks about "passing [one's] son and daughter through fire" (II Kings 16:3 [son], 17:17, 21:6 [son]). II Kings 23:10 speaks about "passing [one's] son or daughter through fire to Moloch." Some scholars interpret the phrase lә-haʿavir ba-esh, as a reference to a divinatory or protective rite in which children were passed through a fire but not physically harmed. However, the same phrase lә-haʿavir ba-esh is found in an unmistakable context of burning in Numbers 31:23. 

Other biblical texts refer to the sacrifice of children. Psalms 106:37–38 speaks of child sacrifice to the unnamed idols of Canaan. In prophetic sources, Jeremiah 7:31 and Ezekiel 20:25–6 speak disapprovingly of sacrificing children to Yahweh (for the "bad statutes" referred to by Ezekiel, see Ex. 22:28–29; but see Friebel); Jeremiah 19:5 speaks of sacrificing children to Baal; Ezekiel 16:21, 20:31, 23:37, 39 of sacrificing children to unnamed divinities; as does Isaiah 57:5. In none of these is there a mention of Moloch. Only in Jeremiah 32:35 is Moloch mentioned by name and there he is associated with Baal. 

Distinction should be made between human sacrifice as a sporadic deed at a time of crisis and distress, such as the holocaust of the son of Mesha king of Moab (II Kings 3:27), or as an act which serves to express an unusual degree of religious devotion as the binding of Isaac (cf. Micah 6:7), on the one hand, and the Moloch cult which was an established institution with a fixed location (the Topheth), on the other. As the classical sources have it, the sacrifices of children at Carthage, a colony founded by Phoenicians on the coast of Northeast Tunisia, usually came after a defeat and a great disaster – a religious practice based upon an ancient mythological tradition. Thus Phoenician tradition ascribed to Sanchuniaton relates that the god Elos (= El) sacrificed his son following a war which brought disaster upon the state. If the classical reports are accurate, it could be maintained that there is no real connection therefore between the Phoenician-Punic child sacrifices which are sporadic and conditioned by crisis and the Moloch worship which was an institution or cult. In contrast though to the classical reports, the archaeological discoveries at Carthage, which attest some 20,000 burials of infant bones along with animal bones in what are evidently not instances of natural death appear to conflict with the classical reports. There is as yet no evidence of child sacrifice in the Carthaginian homeland, the cities of Phoenicia (Lebanon) proper, where far less excavation has been done.

The Name

The accepted view since Abraham Geiger is that Moloch is a tendentious mis-vocalization of the word melekh, "king," the original vowels being changed and patterned after the vocalization of boshet, "shame," which was often used as an intentional substitute for Baal (see Euphemism and Dysphemism ). It is true that the names Moloch (I Kings 11:7) and Milcom occur in the Bible in reference to an Ammonite god, and that deities by the name Malik/Muluk are attested to from the 18^th century B.C.E. onward. However, the laws and warnings against the worship of the Moloch could hardly refer to these particular deities. It is unlikely that one particular god who is not especially famous would be singled out for mention, while other prominent gods, e.g., Baal, are not mentioned by name in the Torah even once. That the original vocalization was melekh may be learned from Isaiah 30:33, which undoubtedly alludes to the fiery ceremony of the Moloch rites. The fact that the Septuagint of the Pentateuch (which was the first to be translated by the Greek translators) translates molekh as "king" (archon) seems also to indicate that at the time of the translation of the Torah, the reading molekh instead of melekh was as yet unknown.

A RÉPLICA DO ARCO DO TEMPLO DE BAAL EM TRAFAGAL SQUARE, LONDRES, FOI INAUGURADA NO DIA 19, DOIS DIAS ANTES DA MORTE DE PRINCE (PODE SER QUE PRINCE TENHA MORRIDO NO MESMO DIA E ENCONTRARAM O CORPO DELE NO DIA 21, VAI SABER!!!!) VEJAM:



SÓ QUE TEM UM DETALHE, NA ÚLTIMA HORA MUDARAM O NOME PARA "ARCO DO TRIUNFO DE PALMYRA", TIRARAM A MENÇÃO A BAAL!!!!

OU SEJA, ESSES ILLUMINATI SAO PHODA, ATÉ A MUDANÇA DO NOME JÁ ESTAVA PREVISTO, MAS ELES QUISERAM FAZER PRIMEIRO PUBLICIDADE COM O NOME "ARCO DO TEMPLO DE BAAL" (QUE É O NOME VERDADEIRO) PARA DEIXAR OS CONSPIRACIONISTAS MALUQUINHOS, AE VOCÊ QUE É CONSPIRACIONISTA FICA INDIGNADO QUANDO UM ZÉ MANÉ TURISTA LER NO FOLHETO QUE O NOME TEM NADA A VER COM BAAL, E VOCÊ TENTANDO CONVENCÊ-LO DO CONTRÁRIO, VOCE VAI PARECER LUNÁTICO, SACARAM A JOGADA????

REPENTINAMENTE , O PORTAL QUE INSTALARIAM EM TIMES SQUARE FOI "CANCELADO"



É CLARO QUE VÃO COLOCAR UM, EM ALGUMA LOJA MAÇÔNICA NOS ARREDORES DE TIMES SQUARE!!! 

APENAS O PÚBLICO NÃO TERÁ ACESSO A ELE, ASSIM COMO ZILHÕES DE LOJAS MAÇÔNICAS AO REDOR DO MUNDO PODERÃO RECEBER UMA RÉPLICA, APENAS A DE LONDRES ESTARÁ ESCANCARADA PORQUE DIGAMOS LONDRES É A CAPITAL DA MAÇONARIA.

SEGUNDO AS MINHAS ELUCUBRAÇÕES HOLÍSTICAS PARANORMAIS, O TEMPLO INTEIRO DE BAAL-SHAMIN EM PALMIRA NÃO FOI DESTRUÍDO, NO MEU COMPLEXO ENTENDER, ELE PODE TER SIDO CIRURGICAMENTE DESMONTADO E ENVIADO PARA LONDRES OU NEW YORK!!!!!!

E TEM MAIS!!!!!!

A INAUGURAÇÃO DESSA RÉPLICA DO ARCO DO TEMPLO DE BAAL (OU DO TEMPLO INTEIRO MOVIDO) COINCIDE COM O SACRIFÍCIO A BAAL/MOLOCH DO CANTOR PRINCE (LEMBREM-SE QUE MICHAEL JACKSON E TANTAS OUTRAS ESTRELAS SÃO REGULARMENTE SACRIFICADAS POR ESSES DOENTES) !!!!!

"BLOOD SACRIFICE TO BAAL"

MALDITO MOLEQUE-URSO

ELE DESCOBRE TODOS OS NOSSOS PLANOS!!!!